Could Stablecoins Spark a New Contagion BIS Warns Coinbase

As concerns mount over global economic stability, warnings are surfacing about the potential risks posed by stablecoins. Central bank officials in Europe and Asia are expressing apprehension that the volatility in bond markets, exacerbated by events such as new U.S. trade barriers, could expose vulnerabilities within the stablecoin ecosystem. The question being asked is: Could Stablecoins Spark a New Contagion? BIS Warns, Coinbase, and other industry players are now facing increased scrutiny as regulators assess the potential for a systemic crisis.

Official guidance: SEC – official guidance for Could Stablecoins Spark a New Contagion? BIS Warns, Coinbase

Key Developments

Recent statements from financial authorities highlight the growing unease surrounding stablecoins. The Dutch National Bank (DNB), for instance, has voiced concerns that a run on dollar-pegged tokens could trigger fire sales of U.S. Treasury bonds, potentially forcing central banks to reconsider their monetary policies. This echoes the sentiment of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), which have both suggested that global economic stress could increase stablecoin use while simultaneously eroding the value and liquidity of their backing assets. The debate over whether Could Stablecoins Spark a New Contagion? BIS Warns, Coinbase, and other firms, continues, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and regulation.

However, not all voices are aligned in this concern. Stephen Miran, a U.S. Federal Reserve Governor, has offered a contrasting perspective, viewing stablecoins as an innovation that is becoming an established part of the financial landscape. This divergence of opinion underscores the complexity of the issue and the ongoing debate about the true risk stablecoins pose to the broader financial system.

Potential Triggers and Market Impact

Section image

Several events have served as potential warning signs. Donald Trump’s tariff threats, for example, have demonstrated the capacity to send shockwaves through the crypto market, wiping out billions in value in a single day. Similarly, the USDC depeg of March 2023, following the Silicon Valley Bank failure, illustrated how real-world financial shocks can trigger sudden redemptions in even the largest fiat-backed stablecoins. These incidents highlight the vulnerability of stablecoins to external pressures and the potential for rapid destabilization.

The concentration of the stablecoin market, with Tether and Circle controlling a significant portion, further exacerbates these risks. A DNB report emphasized that this concentration, coupled with the explosive growth of the market, creates a “huge risk” of mass redemptions. Such redemptions, similar to what followed the Silicon Valley Bank collapse, could trigger sell-offs of U.S. Treasuries, stress crypto exchanges, and ripple through European financial institutions. The BIS has also cautioned that even a moderate redemption shock could rival the Treasury market stress episodes seen in March 2020. This raises serious questions about whether Could Stablecoins Spark a New Contagion? BIS Warns, and whether existing safeguards are sufficient.

Regulatory Responses and Industry Projections

Supporting image

The potential for Could Stablecoins Spark a New Contagion? BIS Warns, is prompting increased regulatory scrutiny and debate. The U.S. GENIUS Act, for instance, is being considered in the context of its potential impact on stablecoin growth and stability. While some, like Governor Miran, believe that the lack of yield and federal deposit insurance in GENIUS Act payment stablecoins will prevent a broad flight from the domestic banking system, others remain cautious about the rapid expansion of the market. Industry projections estimate that the stablecoin market could reach $2 trillion within three years under the U.S. GENIUS Act, and potentially grow to $4 trillion by 2035. These figures highlight the urgent need for effective regulation to mitigate the risks associated with such rapid growth.

The RBA has noted the significant growth in stablecoin volume, exceeding 50% in the 12 months leading up to June 2025, and has warned of the risks this growth represents. The BIS, alongside other financial institutions, agrees that global economic stress increases stablecoin use abroad while simultaneously eroding the value and liquidity of the assets backing them. This convergence of concerns underscores the potential systemic implications of stablecoin instability and the need for coordinated international regulatory efforts.

Addressing Systemic Risk

The core concern revolves around the potential for stablecoins to trigger a fire sale of U.S. Treasury bonds, creating a domino effect that could destabilize global financial markets. The BIS and RBA have both highlighted this risk, emphasizing that a sudden decline in sentiment towards stablecoins could trigger asset fire sales with the potential to spill over into repo and other core US funding markets. If tariffs push yields higher and liquidity lower, Treasury bills become less stable precisely when they are needed most, cautioned DNB Governor Olaf Sleijpen. “If stablecoins are not that stable,” Sleijpen said, “you could end up in a situation where the underlying assets need to be sold quickly.” The question now is: Could Stablecoins Spark a New Contagion? BIS Warns, and what measures can be taken to prevent such a scenario?

The debate surrounding whether Could Stablecoins Spark a New Contagion? BIS Warns, highlights the urgent need for a comprehensive understanding of the risks associated with these digital assets. As the stablecoin market continues to evolve and expand, regulators and industry participants alike must collaborate to develop robust frameworks that promote stability, transparency, and investor protection. The potential for a systemic crisis underscores the importance of proactive measures to mitigate the risks and ensure the long-term health of the global financial system.

Financial Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *