Illinois Roofing Company Sued Race Sex strategies

Illinois Roofing Company Sued Over Alleged Race and Sex Harassment

In 2025, Anthony Roofing Tecta America LLC and its parent company, Tecta America Corporation, prominent roofing service providers with operations in Illinois and across the nation, faced a significant legal challenge. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit alleging the company subjected African American and female employees at its Aurora, Illinois location to a hostile work environment characterized by race and sex harassment. This case highlights the critical importance of fostering inclusive workplaces and adhering to federal anti-discrimination laws.

Official guidance: IMF resource: Illinois Roofing Company Sued Race Sex strategies

EEOC Lawsuit Details Allegations of Severe Harassment

The EEOC’s lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (EEOC v. Tecta America Corp. and Anthony Roofing Tecta America LLC, Case No. 1:25-cv-14252), paints a disturbing picture of the alleged workplace environment. According to the EEOC, a vice president at Anthony Roofing engaged in egregious racial harassment against a Black employee. This included repeated use of the N-word and referring to the employee as his “slave,” among other highly offensive racial slurs. The lawsuit claims that despite the employee’s objections, the company failed to take corrective action, allowing the harassment to persist and ultimately forcing the employee to resign to escape the abusive environment.

Furthermore, the EEOC alleged that other Black employees were also subjected to racial harassment by both supervisors and fellow employees. This harassment included the use of racial slurs, being called “boy,” and other forms of offensive language. The cumulative effect of this alleged behavior created a hostile and discriminatory work environment for African American employees, violating their rights under federal law.

Sexual Harassment Claims Against Company Leadership

The lawsuit also detailed allegations of sexual harassment perpetrated by the same vice president. According to the EEOC, female employees were subjected to offensive comments about oral sex, derogatory remarks about their bodies, and inappropriate, sex-based questions in the workplace. These allegations paint a picture of a workplace where female employees were subjected to unwelcome and offensive conduct based on their gender, creating a hostile and intimidating environment.

A key element of the EEOC’s case is the allegation that employees reported the race and sex harassment to both management at Anthony Roofing and to Tecta America’s human resources department. Despite these reports, the EEOC claims that the harassment continued unabated. This alleged failure to address the reported harassment is a critical component of the lawsuit, as it suggests a systemic failure to protect employees from discrimination and harassment.

Legal Implications and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

The EEOC’s lawsuit asserts that the alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This includes workplace harassment that creates a hostile work environment. To establish a claim of hostile work environment harassment, an employee must demonstrate that the harassment was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of their employment and create an abusive working environment.

The EEOC plays a crucial role in enforcing Title VII and other federal anti-discrimination laws. Before filing a lawsuit, the EEOC typically attempts to resolve the matter through a pre-litigation settlement process known as conciliation. In this case, the EEOC stated that it first attempted to reach a settlement with Tecta America and Anthony Roofing through conciliation but was unsuccessful, leading to the filing of the lawsuit.

Practical Implications for Employers and Insurance Considerations

This case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of creating and maintaining a workplace free from discrimination and harassment. Employers should implement comprehensive anti-harassment policies, provide regular training to employees and supervisors, and establish clear procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of harassment. A proactive approach to preventing harassment can not only protect employees but also mitigate the risk of costly lawsuits and reputational damage.

From an insurance perspective, companies should ensure they have adequate Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI) coverage. EPLI policies can help cover the costs of defending against and settling employment-related lawsuits, including those alleging discrimination and harassment. However, it’s important to carefully review the terms and conditions of EPLI policies, as they may contain exclusions or limitations on coverage. Insurers often require companies to demonstrate that they have implemented effective risk management practices, such as anti-harassment training and complaint procedures, to qualify for EPLI coverage.

Conclusion

The EEOC’s lawsuit against Anthony Roofing Tecta America and Tecta America Corporation underscores the ongoing challenges of preventing race and sex harassment in the workplace. This case serves as a cautionary tale for employers, highlighting the importance of fostering a culture of respect and inclusivity, and diligently addressing any reports of harassment. The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for the company and reinforce the importance of adhering to federal anti-discrimination laws. For businesses of all sizes, investing in robust anti-harassment policies, training, and reporting mechanisms is not only ethically sound but also a critical risk management strategy.

Disclaimer: The information in this article is for general guidance only and may contain affiliate links. Always verify details with official sources.

Explore more: related articles.