The UN Security Council has voted to adopt a US-drafted resolution endorsing President Donald Trump’s 20-point plan for Gaza. This resolution, concerning Trump’s plan for Gaza backed by UN Security Council, includes provisions for an International Stabilisation Force (ISF) and a transitional governance body. The vote saw 13 countries in favor, none against, and abstentions from Russia and China.
Table of contents
Official guidance: USA.gov — official guidance for Trump’s plan for Gaza backed by UN Security Council
Main Points
The resolution establishes an International Stabilisation Force (ISF), intended to work with Israel, Egypt, and a newly trained Palestinian police force to secure border areas and disarm non-state armed groups, including Hamas. The United States claims multiple countries have offered to contribute to the ISF. The resolution also approves the creation of a Board of Peace (BoP), a transitional governance body to oversee the reconstruction of Gaza and the delivery of humanitarian aid, supervised by a Palestinian technocratic committee. Financing for reconstruction would come from a World Bank-backed trust fund.
According to the US Ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz, the ISF would be responsible for securing the area, supporting the demilitarisation of Gaza, dismantling terrorist infrastructure, removing weapons, and ensuring the safety of Palestinian civilians. Trump’s plan for Gaza backed by UN Security Council aims to establish a framework for long-term stability and governance in the region. The initial phase of the plan, which includes a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas and the exchange of hostages and detainees, came into effect on October 10.
Reactions to the Resolution
Hamas has rejected the resolution, stating that it fails to meet Palestinian rights and demands and imposes an international guardianship mechanism on the Gaza Strip. The group views the ISF as a potential party to the conflict, favoring the “occupation” and stripping the resistance of its neutrality. Despite these objections, the Palestinian Authority (PA) has called for the immediate implementation of the resolution’s terms.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres’ spokesperson emphasized that the resolution needs to translate into concrete steps on the ground, leading to a political process for achieving a two-state solution. Russia and China, while abstaining from the vote, criticized the resolution for lacking clarity on the composition of key mechanisms, failing to ensure UN participation, and not explicitly reiterating a firm commitment to the two-state solution. Trump’s plan for Gaza backed by UN Security Council has garnered mixed reactions globally.
The Role of the International Stabilisation Force
The International Stabilisation Force (ISF) is a key component of Trump’s plan for Gaza backed by UN Security Council. Its primary role involves securing the Gaza Strip, supporting demilitarisation efforts, and ensuring the removal of weapons. Working in conjunction with Israel, Egypt, and a newly trained Palestinian police force, the ISF aims to create a stable environment conducive to long-term peace. The force would also be responsible for dismantling terrorist infrastructure and safeguarding Palestinian civilians, according to Ambassador Waltz.
The establishment of the ISF marks a significant shift in the security dynamics of the region. Until now, the police force in Gaza has operated under the authority of Hamas. The ISF’s mandate to disarm non-state armed groups and secure border areas represents a substantial change in the governance and security structure of the Gaza Strip. The success of Trump’s plan for Gaza backed by UN Security Council hinges significantly on the effectiveness and impartiality of the ISF.
Future Implications and Challenges
The resolution includes a reference to a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood, a provision that was strongly advocated for by several council members. However, Israel’s opposition to the creation of a Palestinian state remains a significant obstacle. The inclusion of Palestinian self-determination in the text was a result of pressure from key Arab states, highlighting the complex geopolitical dynamics at play.
Trump hailed the Security Council vote as “historic,” stating it was a way of acknowledging and endorsing the Board of Peace (BoP). He is expected to chair the board, the final membership of which is yet to be announced. The implementation of Trump’s plan for Gaza backed by UN Security Council faces numerous challenges, including overcoming resistance from Hamas, ensuring the cooperation of all involved parties, and securing adequate funding for the reconstruction of Gaza. The long-term success of the plan will depend on addressing these challenges effectively and fostering a genuine commitment to peace and stability in the region.
The UN Security Council’s backing of Trump’s plan for Gaza represents a significant, albeit contested, step towards establishing a framework for peace and reconstruction in the region. While the resolution has garnered support from key international players, including the US and the Palestinian Authority, it faces significant opposition from Hamas and criticisms from Russia and China. The success of Trump’s plan for Gaza backed by UN Security Council will depend on the effective implementation of its provisions and a sustained commitment to addressing the underlying issues that fuel the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Note: Information based on credible sources and industry analysis.
Disclaimer: The information in this article is for general guidance only and may contain affiliate links. Always verify details with official sources.
Explore more: related articles.
